Security & compliance readiness
The operating model,
written down.
A public overview of how Battle Bound Cloud is designed to be secured and operated — at the level a security overview should carry, and no further.
Current compliance status
TX-RAMP assessment preparation in progress
Architecture, documentation, and control evidence are being prepared for the applicable TX-RAMP assessment process.
Battle Bound Cloud is being developed and documented as a separately defined SaaS product. Certification or authorization status will be published only after formal confirmation.
Security boundary
The website is not the product.
Battle Bound Cloud is designed as a separately operated SaaS environment with its own application, administration, and security boundary. battleboundbranding.com is the marketing and account-entry surface for the product; it does not host the product, hold agency data, or carry the product’s assessment scope.
Marketing and account entry
battleboundbranding.com
- Marketing content
- Public pricing structure
- Public product documentation links
- Sales qualification
- Consultation requests
- Non-sensitive lead information
Battle Bound Cloud application
cloud.battleboundbranding.com
- Authentication
- Agency tenant administration
- Role-based access control
- Agency data
- Deployments
- Audit records
- Monitoring
- Metering
- Compliance evidence
The two sides do not share a database, and a battleboundbranding.com account is never treated as an authorized Battle Bound Cloud user. Product access requires a separate approved onboarding or identity-federation flow.
Security overview
Eighteen questions a security reviewer will ask.
This page describes the operating model at the level a public security overview should carry. Account identifiers, resource names, network addressing, rule sets, findings, and incident runbooks are shared under an engagement, not published.
SaaS security boundary
Battle Bound Cloud is designed as a separately operated application with its own hostnames, authentication, administration, and data stores. The marketing website is outside that boundary: it publishes information and collects sales-qualification requests, and it holds no tenant data, no administration, and no deployment control.
AWS hosting model
The platform is designed to run on AWS, using managed services for delivery, compute, storage, database, key management, and monitoring. AWS secures the infrastructure it operates; Battle Bound Branding is responsible for the application and its configuration.
Encryption in transit
Public and administrative traffic is designed to be served over HTTPS with modern TLS, terminated at the managed edge and load-balancing layer.
Encryption at rest
Object storage, database storage, and backups are designed to use managed encryption at rest with keys held in a managed key-management service.
Identity and access controls
Access is designed around named accounts and defined roles rather than shared logins, with least-privilege permissions for platform operations and separate paths for customer administrators.
Tenant isolation
Each agency environment is designed to keep its configuration, content, and access separate from every other tenant. The isolation model for a given engagement depends on the data classification and impact level agreed during onboarding.
Logging and monitoring
Access, application, and platform logs are designed to be collected centrally, with availability and error monitoring and alerting routed to the operations team.
Change management
Changes move through source control, review, and a build pipeline rather than direct edits to a running environment, so what is running can be traced to an approved change.
Deployment approvals
Production deployments are designed to require a recorded approval, so a release into an agency environment has a named approver and a timestamp.
Vulnerability management
Dependency and platform vulnerabilities follow a defined path from detection to triage, remediation, and verification, with severity driving the timeline agreed in the scope of work. Specific findings are handled under the engagement rather than published.
Backup and recovery planning
Backup scope, retention, restoration procedure, and recovery objectives are documented per engagement and confirmed with the customer rather than assumed.
Incident-response planning
Notification paths, responsibilities, and coordination steps are agreed before an incident. Procedural detail that would help an attacker is shared under the engagement, not published.
Subservice providers
The platform is designed to depend on a small, named set of infrastructure and operational providers. The list applicable to an engagement, and what each provider can access, is disclosed during onboarding.
Data handling
The service is intended for the content and records an organization chooses to place in it under the agreed classification. Anything outside that classification is handled by exception and in writing, not by assumption.
Data retention
Retention periods for content, logs, and backups are set per engagement and written into the scope of work, so an agency can answer a records question without asking us first.
Customer offboarding
Offboarding is a defined process: access is withdrawn on an agreed schedule, and the customer’s data is returned or deleted according to the terms in the engagement.
Secure data return and deletion
Data return is designed to be delivered in a documented format over an authenticated channel, followed by deletion within the retention window stated in the engagement.
Current assessment status
Battle Bound Cloud is being developed and documented as a separately defined SaaS product. Certification or authorization status will be published only after formal confirmation.
Send us the
security questionnaire.
Bring your requirements and we will tell you plainly which we can meet today, which are planned, and which are outside the product.